![]() ![]() ![]() He whined that social media posts by Trump and his son about the trial were “pure protected opinion,” and thus the judge’s implied threats of contempt charges “reflect a predisposition which is underlying its unfair treatment of Defendant in this matter.” By contrast, he characterized a story in a UK tabloid about a mock jury convened by Carroll’s team finding Trump guilty as “the pinnacle of prejudicial.”įrom Korey Clark, Editor, State Net Capitol Journal™ He also repeated for a third time his complaint that one of Carroll’s propensity witnesses should be excluded because there’s some question whether Trump tried to touch her genitals or just threw her against the wall and tried to kiss her. ![]() In reality, the funding was secured in 2020 after she filed the complaint, and is irrelevant to Trump’s allegedly defamatory statements in 2019. Tacopina tried to get previously excluded testimony on litigation funding admitted by claiming that Carroll herself brought it in when she said that she sued because Trump falsely accused her of being a Democratic operative. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |